The Ultimate Guide to 3D Force Plates in Human Movement Analysis

Every day, we wage a silent battle against invisible forces. An elite sprinter explodes from the blocks, transferring immense power to the track in a fraction of a second. A patient recovering from a stroke carefully shifts their weight, taking a tentative first step toward independence. An industrial worker hefts a heavy box, their spine absorbing the strain. These moments, which define the limits of human performance and the essence of recovery, are all governed by the interaction between the body and the ground. For centuries, these critical forces were unseen, felt but not measured. Today, a remarkable piece of technology—the 3D force plate – makes them visible, quantifiable, and, most importantly, understandable.

Coined by world-leading biomechanist Dr. Jason Lake as a “fancy bathroom scale,” the analogy is both simple and profound.¹ A standard bathroom scale tells you your body mass, a static number. A force plate, however, tells you a dynamic story. It reveals how you use that mass—how you generate explosive power, how you maintain delicate balance, how you absorb impact, and how you interact with the world in every step, jump, or lift. It measures the very language of movement: force.

For decades, this technology was the exclusive domain of high-tech biomechanics laboratories, its secrets accessible only to a select few researchers. But a revolution has been underway. Force plates have evolved from cumbersome, stationary behemoths into portable, wireless, and slowly increasingly affordable tools. This has brought them out of the lab and into the clinic, the training facility, and the athletic field. Yet, as this powerful technology becomes more accessible, a knowledge gap has emerged. What exactly is it? How does it work? And what do the streams of complex data truly mean for a coach trying to build a more explosive athlete, a physical therapist guiding a patient back from injury, or a doctor making a return-to-play decision?

This report aims to be the ultimate resource on the topic, bridging the two worlds of human movement analysis. It is designed to be exhaustive enough for the biomechanical researcher who demands technical precision and insightful enough for the athletic coach, physical therapist, or rehabilitation doctor who needs practical, actionable knowledge. We will journey from the fundamental physics that make force plates possible to the cutting-edge AI that will define their future, decoding the technology, the data, and its profound implications for human health and performance.

The Ground Truth – What is a 3D Force Plate?

At the heart of all movement on Earth is a fundamental principle of physics articulated by Isaac Newton more than three centuries ago: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.² When a person stands, walks, or jumps, they exert a force on the ground. In turn, the ground exerts an equal and opposite force back on their body. This reactive force is known as the

Ground Reaction Force (GRF), and it is the primary quantity that a force plate is designed to measure.³

A 3D force plate is a highly sophisticated measuring platform engineered to precisely quantify the three-dimensional GRF generated by a body standing on or moving across its surface.⁸ It serves as a critical tool in a vast array of fields, from clinical rehabilitation, where it is used for gait and balance analysis, to elite sports, where it measures the forces produced during highly dynamic movements.⁸

From 1D to 3D: Why All Three Dimensions Matter

The evolution from one-dimensional to three-dimensional measurement marked a fundamental shift in what the technology could reveal about human movement. While a 1D plate could answer the question of “how much” vertical force an athlete produced, a 3D plate began to answer the far more nuanced and important question of “how” that force was generated, controlled, and directed.

A 1D (uniaxial) force plate measures force along a single axis—the vertical direction, often denoted as the Z-axis (Fz​).² These plates are sufficient for simple assessments where the primary interest is vertical force, such as in a squat jump or a countermovement jump, where the goal is to maximize upward propulsion.⁶ They can tell you the peak force an athlete pushes into the ground with and can be used to calculate jump height.

A 3D (triaxial) force plate, however, provides a far more complete picture by measuring forces along three orthogonal axes ²:

• Vertical (Z-axis, Fz​): This is the upward and downward force component. It counteracts gravity when standing still and is the primary driver of performance in vertical movements like jumping.
• Anterior-Posterior (Y-axis, Fy​): This is the forward and backward force component. These are the braking forces (as the foot lands and slows the body’s momentum) and propulsive forces (as the foot pushes off to accelerate the body forward). This axis is indispensable for analyzing gait, running, and sprinting.
• Medial-Lateral (X-axis, Fx​): This is the side-to-side force component. These forces are essential for understanding balance, postural stability, and the mechanics of change-of-direction movements like cutting, shuffling, or lateral jumps.

The ability to capture these horizontal or “shear” forces is what makes 3D plates so powerful. It allows for a comprehensive and robust analysis of movement that reveals the underlying strategy an athlete or patient is using.⁵ For instance, two basketball players might achieve the same vertical jump height—a metric a 1D plate could capture. However, a 3D analysis might reveal that one athlete produces force efficiently with minimal wasted energy, while the other exhibits significant side-to-side wobble (high medial-lateral forces), indicating poor stability, inefficient technique, or a potential risk for injury.¹¹ The addition of the X and Y axes transformed the force plate from a simple performance-quantification tool into a sophisticated diagnostic instrument capable of analyzing movement quality.

The Anatomy of a Force Plate

Structurally, a typical 3D force plate consists of a rigid, flat top plate made of metal or composite material, which is the surface a person stands or moves on. This top plate is mounted on several force transducers—the sensors that do the actual measuring.⁵ Most modern research-grade and high-quality commercial plates use a multi-pedestal design, with four 3-component force sensors located in the corners.⁵ These sensors are installed under high pretension between the cover plate and a solid mounting base.

This four-corner design is critical because it allows the plate to accurately measure forces that migrate across its surface, which is the case in nearly all human movements.⁹ As a person walks across the plate, the point of force application moves from their heel to their toes. The individual signals from the four corner sensors allow the system’s software to calculate not only the total force but also precisely where on the plate that force is being applied at any given millisecond.

From Lab to Sideline – A Brief History of Seeing the Invisible

The story of the force plate is a story of democratization. It charts the journey of a technology from an esoteric, exclusive research tool, confined to the pristine environments of well-funded laboratories, to a rugged, portable, and soon mainstream performance and health device used on sidelines and in clinics around the world. This trajectory was not driven by a single breakthrough, but by a parallel evolution in both hardware, which made the technology portable, and software, which made its complex data usable.

The Conceptual Roots

The human fascination with movement is ancient. Aristotle penned treatises on animal locomotion, and Renaissance masters like Leonardo da Vinci produced detailed anatomical studies of the human form in motion.¹⁴ However, the scientific quantification of movement began in earnest with Sir Isaac Newton’s Laws of Motion in the 17th century. Early pioneers like Giovanni Borelli applied these mechanical principles to biology, even estimating the location of the human body’s center of gravity.¹⁵

The 19th century brought the first tools to freeze and analyze movement visually. The chronophotography of Étienne-Jules Marey and the high-speed photography of Eadweard Muybridge provided the first sequential images of athletes in motion, laying the groundwork for modern kinematic analysis.¹⁴

The Commercial Era and The “Gold Standard” Labs

The first rudimentary force plates for studying human gait appeared in the 1930s.³ The field took a significant leap forward in the 1940s and 50s through the pioneering work of Verne Inman and his team at the University of California, who championed an interdisciplinary approach that fused engineering principles with orthopedics and anatomy to analyze gait.¹⁵

The modern era of force measurement, however, began in the late 1960s and 1970s with the advent of commercially available, high-precision instruments. Two technologies and companies emerged as the early leaders, setting the standards for decades to come:

• 1969: The Swiss company Kistler Instruments introduced the first commercially available 3D piezoelectric force plate.¹ This was a landmark event, establishing piezoelectric sensor technology as a research-grade standard known for its high fidelity in measuring dynamic forces.
• 1976: In the United States, Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc. (AMTI) constructed the first commercially available strain gauge force plate. It was developed specifically for gait analysis at the renowned biomechanics laboratory of the Boston Children’s Hospital.⁹

These companies, along with Bertec Corporation which entered the market in the 1980s, became the “gold standard”.¹ Their force plates were fixtures in university and hospital biomechanics labs. However, this early technology had significant limitations that kept it confined to these elite settings. The plates were large, heavy, and permanently installed in the floor. The data acquisition process was cumbersome, and the analysis was a painstaking, manual affair that required specialized computing skills and prohibitive amounts of time.⁷ The high cost and complexity created a formidable barrier to entry.

The Revolution of Portability and Accessibility

The last two decades, and particularly the last five to ten years, have witnessed a dramatic transformation. A convergence of technological advancements has shattered the old barriers, making force analysis accessible to a much broader audience of practitioners.¹

A surprising catalyst for this shift came from an unlikely source: the video game industry. In 2007, Nintendo released the Wii console with its Balance Board accessory. By 2010, researchers had published studies showing that this sub-$100 device was a valid and reliable instrument for measuring weight distribution and postural sway when compared to laboratory-grade force plates costing tens of thousands of dollars.⁹ While the Wii board could not perform a full 3D kinetic analysis, its validation was a disruptive “proof of concept.” It shattered the long-held paradigm that force measurement had to be prohibitively expensive, demonstrating that “good enough” data for certain applications could be achieved with radically cheaper technology. This likely spurred innovation and investment into a new market segment sitting between the ultra-cheap gaming peripheral and the ultra-expensive lab system.

This new wave of innovation focused on two key areas: hardware portability and software usability.

1. Hardware Portability: Companies began engineering force plates that were smaller, lighter, and battery-powered. A key milestone occurred in 2017, when Hawkin Dynamics created the first truly wireless force platform and mobile app, eliminating the tangle of cables that had long tethered the technology to a computer station.⁹ This allowed the tool to physically leave the lab and be used on the court, on the field, or in any clinical setting.
2. Software Usability: Perhaps more importantly, companies like VALD Performance, Kinvent, and Hawkin Dynamics invested heavily in developing user-friendly software; however some only offering 1D force plates.⁷ Instead of outputting raw data streams that required expert analysis, their platforms provided intuitive mobile apps with automated test detection, real-time feedback, and clear, visually appealing reports. This directly addressed the “specialized computing skills” barrier, empowering coaches and clinicians to get actionable insights in seconds, not hours.²⁰

This powerful combination of portable hardware and intelligent software created a tipping point. Force plates were no longer just for researchers; they were now practical, everyday tools for physical therapists, athletic trainers, and strength coaches, fundamentally democratizing the science of human movement.¹

Under the Hood – The Technology That Powers the Plate

To truly understand the data a force plate produces, it is essential to look “under the hood” at the core technologies that convert a physical push or pull into a measurable electrical signal. At the heart of every force plate are transducers—specialized sensors that perform this magical conversion.¹ In the world of force measurement, two main types of transducer technology dominate: piezoelectric sensors and strain gauge sensors. The choice between them represents a fundamental trade-off in design, performance, and cost, and it often defines the plate’s ideal application.

Piezoelectric Sensors: The Crystal-Powered Standard

Piezoelectric sensors are built around a remarkable property of certain crystalline materials, most notably quartz.⁴ When a mechanical stress (force) is applied to a piezoelectric crystal, it deforms at a microscopic level, causing a shift in its internal electrical charge. This generates a tiny electrical charge on the crystal’s surface that is directly proportional to the applied force.²³ A highly sensitive device called a charge amplifier then measures this charge and converts it into a usable voltage signal.²³

This mechanism gives piezoelectric force plates several distinct characteristics:

• High Stiffness and High Natural Frequency: The deformation of the quartz crystal is incredibly small. This means the sensor is extremely rigid and stiff, giving it a very high natural frequency. This is a significant advantage for measuring very fast, highly dynamic, and high-impact events, as the sensor can respond almost instantaneously without vibrating or oscillating itself.²³
• Extremely Wide Measuring Range: Piezoelectric sensors are exceptionally sensitive and can offer precise measurements across an enormous range, from the very small forces produced by a child’s footstep to the massive impact forces of an elite athlete’s landing.⁵
• Exceptional Durability: Because they undergo minimal physical deformation, these sensors are highly resistant to fatigue and can withstand millions of high-load cycles, making them incredibly durable.²⁶
• Signal Drift: The primary drawback of the piezoelectric principle is that the electrical charge it generates is volatile and can dissipate over time if not perfectly isolated. This leads to a small but constant signal “drift,” making these sensors less suitable for truly static, long-term measurements (e.g., monitoring a person’s posture for several minutes).²²
• Cost: The manufacturing process for high-quality piezoelectric sensors is complex, generally making them the more expensive option.²⁸

For these reasons, piezoelectric force plates, pioneered by companies like Kistler, are considered the gold standard in research laboratories for high-frequency, dynamic analysis where precision and fidelity are paramount.⁵

Strain Gauge Sensors: The Art of Deformation

Strain gauge technology operates on a different principle. Instead of a crystal, the core component is a flexible spring element to which a metallic foil pattern—the strain gauge—is bonded.³⁰ When force is applied to the plate, this spring element deforms elastically by a very small, controlled amount. This deformation stretches or compresses the foil of the strain gauge, which in turn changes its electrical resistance.⁴ This minute change in resistance is then measured using a sensitive electrical circuit called a Wheatstone bridge, which outputs a voltage signal proportional to the applied force.²

This reliance on controlled deformation gives strain gauge plates their unique set of characteristics:

• Excellent for Static Measurement: Strain gauge-based systems exhibit virtually no signal drift, making them the superior choice for long-term monitoring and true static force measurements where stability over time is critical.²⁷
• High Accuracy and Linearity: These systems can be engineered to provide exceptionally high accuracy and a very linear response, meaning the output voltage is directly and predictably proportional to the input force. This simplifies calibration and data interpretation.²⁴
• Lower Cost: The components and manufacturing processes for strain gauge sensors are generally less expensive, which has been a key factor in the development of more affordable and accessible force plate systems.²⁴
• Lower Stiffness: Because the system is designed to deform (albeit slightly), it is inherently less stiff than a piezoelectric system and has a lower natural frequency. While modern strain gauge plates are highly capable of measuring dynamic movements, they are theoretically less suited than piezoelectric sensors for capturing extremely high-frequency impact phenomena.²³
• Potential for Fatigue: The reliance on mechanical deformation means that, over a very long period of high-impact use, the spring elements could be susceptible to material fatigue or damage from being overloaded.²³

Strain gauge technology is the backbone of many of the portable and more affordable commercial systems that have driven the recent explosion in force plate popularity. Companies like AMTI and Bertec are well-known for their high-quality strain gauge plates, and this technology is commonly used in systems designed for applied sport and clinical settings.⁹

The following table provides a clear, at-a-glance summary for practitioners to understand the fundamental trade-offs between the two core technologies.

Feature	Piezoelectric Sensor	Strain Gauge Sensor
Working Principle	Measures electrical charge generated by a crystal under mechanical stress.22	Measures the change in electrical resistance of a foil that is deformed with a spring element.27
Best For	Highly dynamic, high-frequency, and impact measurements (e.g., running, jumping, impacts).23	Static or quasi-static measurements and long-term monitoring (e.g., balance, posture).27
Stiffness	Extremely high. The sensor deforms very little, resulting in a high natural frequency.23	Lower. The sensor is designed to deform slightly, resulting in a lower natural frequency.23
Signal Drift	Prone to a small, constant drift, making it less ideal for very long static measurements.22	Virtually no drift, providing excellent long-term stability.27
Accuracy/Linearity	Highly accurate for dynamic events but can have slightly higher linearity error (0.5%).27	Can be engineered for extremely high accuracy (<0.1%) and excellent linearity.24
Cost	Generally more expensive due to complex sensor manufacturing.28	Generally less expensive, enabling more affordable commercial systems.24
Key Brands	Kistler 10	AMTI, Bertec 9

Force Plate vs. Pressure Plate: A Critical Distinction

In the world of ground-based measurement, the terms “force plate” and “pressure plate” are often used interchangeably, but they refer to fundamentally different technologies that provide different types of information.¹

A force plate is a kinetic measurement tool. It is designed to measure the single, resultant GRF vector—that is, the net force being applied to its surface. It accomplishes this with a small number of highly sensitive and accurate transducers (typically four).¹ It can tell you the magnitude, direction, and point of application of the total force, but it cannot provide a “heat map” showing how that force is distributed across the foot.¹

A pressure mapping system (or pressure plate) is a descriptive tool. It uses a dense matrix of hundreds or even thousands of smaller, individual sensors to measure the pressure distribution over its entire surface.¹ This allows it to create the familiar “heat map” image, showing areas of high and low pressure. It can be used to segment the foot and analyze the pressure under specific regions, like the heel, midfoot, or individual metatarsal heads—information a force plate cannot provide.³³

While a pressure plate can estimate the total vertical force by summing the readings from all of its sensors, this measurement is generally less accurate and captured at a lower sampling frequency than what a true force plate provides. This makes pressure plates less suitable for the precise kinetic analysis required for dynamic jump testing or detailed gait analysis.¹ For measuring kinetics, the force plate is considered the “gold standard”.³³ The two tools answer different questions: a force plate tells you about the net forces that cause motion, while a pressure plate tells you about the interface between the body and the ground.

Decoding the Data – From Raw Signals to Actionable Insights

A 3D force plate is a powerful data-gathering tool, but the raw information it produces is just a stream of numbers. The true value lies in transforming these raw signals into meaningful metrics that can provide actionable insights into movement, performance, and health. This process involves a series of calculations that distill complex physics into understandable concepts.

The Language of Force: The Raw 6-Channel Output

At its most fundamental level, a 3D force plate continuously measures and outputs six distinct channels of data.³⁴ These six channels form the basis for all subsequent calculations:

Three Force Components:

• Fx​: Medial-Lateral force (side-to-side).
• Fy​: Anterior-Posterior force (forward-backward).
• Fz​: Vertical force (up-down).

These are measured in Newtons (N), the standard unit of force.

Three Moment (Torque) Components:

• Mx​: Moment about the X-axis (twisting in the frontal plane).
• My​: Moment about the Y-axis (twisting in the sagittal plane).
• Mz​: Moment about the Z-axis (free-twisting or torsional moment).

These are measured in Newton-meters (Nm) and represent the rotational forces acting on the plate. The moments are essential for calculating where the force is being applied.

For this data to be accurate, several procedural steps are critical during data acquisition. The data must be collected at a high sampling frequency—typically 1000 Hz (1000 samples per second) for dynamic movements like jumping—to capture rapid changes in force.³⁸ Before each trial, the plate must be “zeroed” to establish a baseline and subtract any background electronic noise from the signal.³⁸ Furthermore, force plates require periodic recalibration (e.g., every 3-5 years for lab-grade plates) to ensure their sensors remain accurate over time.⁷ Finally, a crucial data processing step involves reconciling the force plate’s own local coordinate system with the global coordinate system of the laboratory or motion capture setup, ensuring that “forward” for the plate is the same as “forward” for the movement being analyzed.⁴⁰

The Resultant Force: Finding the True Magnitude and Direction of Effort

The individual force components (Fx​, Fy​, Fz​) represent the force acting along each cardinal direction. However, an athlete or patient rarely pushes perfectly in just one direction. The resultant force is the vector sum of these three components, representing the single, overall force being applied to the plate at any given instant.⁴²

Its magnitude is calculated using the three-dimensional Pythagorean theorem:

This value gives the true magnitude of the total force exerted, which is invaluable for understanding the overall effort.⁴² The direction of this resultant force vector can also be calculated using trigonometry, revealing the precise angle of the push.⁴⁴

Real-World Example (Baseball Pitching): A pitcher’s ability to generate velocity is linked to how effectively they transfer force from their lower body toward home plate. A 3D force plate under the pitching rubber can measure the components of the drive leg’s push-off. A high resultant force is good, but a high resultant force with a large and efficiently directed anterior-posterior component (Fy​) is even better. This metric shows not just how hard the pitcher is pushing, but also how well they are directing that push toward the target.⁴⁶

The Center of Pressure (CoP): The “Wobble” That Reveals Balance and Strategy

Perhaps one of the most powerful metrics derived from a 3D force plate is the Center of Pressure (CoP). The CoP is the single point on the surface of the force plate where the resultant ground reaction force vector is effectively acting.³ In simpler terms, it is the instantaneous “balance point” of all the forces being applied to the plate.

The CoP is not measured directly; it is calculated from the moment data (Mx​, My​) and the vertical force (Fz​). The twisting moments measured by the plate reveal how far the applied force is from the plate’s center. The simplified equations are:

In these equations, the zoffset​ is a small correction value provided by the manufacturer that accounts for the height of the plate’s surface above the sensors.⁴¹

It is crucial to distinguish the CoP from the Center of Gravity (CoG). The CoG is an imaginary point representing the average location of an object’s mass; it is the body’s balance point in 3D space. The CoP is the point of force application on the supporting surface. To maintain balance, the central nervous system must constantly make small muscular adjustments to move the CoP around the vertical projection of the CoG. The continuous, subtle movement of the CoP is known as postural sway, and it is a direct measure of the neuromuscular system’s activity in maintaining balance.⁴⁹

Real-World Examples:

• Balance Assessment in Rehabilitation: For an elderly individual or a patient recovering from a stroke, a larger and faster CoP excursion (a wider, quicker “wobble”) during a quiet standing test is an objective indicator of poor postural control and an elevated risk of falling. This can be detected with high sensitivity by a force plate even when it is not obvious to the naked eye.⁵²
• Gait Analysis: During a normal walking step, the path of the CoP, known as the CoP trajectory, travels from the lateral side of the heel at initial contact, moves forward along the outside of the foot, and then cuts across to the big toe at push-off. Deviations from this typical path can help diagnose foot pathologies, assess the effectiveness of orthotics, or analyze altered gait patterns.⁴⁹

Impulse: The Secret to Explosive Power and Jump Height

Force alone does not tell the whole story of movement. The duration over which that force is applied is equally important. Impulse is the physical quantity that captures this relationship, defined as the product of force and the time interval over which it acts (Impulse = Force × Time).³ On a force-time graph, impulse is represented by the area under the curve.⁶⁰

The power of impulse lies in the impulse-momentum theorem, a fundamental principle of dynamics. It states that the impulse applied to an object is equal to the change in that object’s momentum (momentum = mass × velocity).⁶¹ In the context of jumping, this means that the total propulsive impulse an athlete generates against the ground before takeoff directly determines their velocity at the moment their feet leave the plate. A greater takeoff velocity, in turn, results in a higher jump height.

Real-World Examples:

• Vertical Jumping: To achieve a maximal vertical jump, an athlete must generate the largest possible impulse. This involves an optimal trade-off: they must produce a very high force but also sustain it for an adequate amount of time. This is why a Countermovement Jump (CMJ), where the athlete first dips down before exploding up, produces a higher jump than a static Squat Jump (SJ). The countermovement (the dip) increases the time available for force production and engages the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC), a neuromuscular phenomenon that allows the muscles to produce more force, thereby maximizing the total impulse.⁶⁰
• Sprint Start: The explosive acceleration of a sprinter out of the blocks is determined by the horizontal impulse they can generate against the blocks in the first fraction of a second. A larger impulse results in a greater change in momentum and a higher velocity leaving the blocks.⁶¹

Peak Force & Rate of Force Development (RFD): Measuring Strength and Explosiveness

While impulse provides a complete picture of force application over time, two other metrics are commonly used to provide a snapshot of an athlete’s strength and power capabilities.

• Peak Force: This is simply the single highest force value recorded during a movement.⁶² It is a straightforward measure of an athlete’s maximal strength capacity in that specific task.⁶⁸
• Rate of Force Development (RFD): This metric measures how quickly an athlete can generate force. It is calculated as the change in force divided by the change in time (RFD=ΔF/Δt), representing the slope of the force-time curve.⁶² RFD is a crucial indicator of explosiveness and is critically important in sports that depend on rapid power production, such as sprinting, Olympic weightlifting, and jumping.⁶² It’s worth noting, however, that RFD can be a difficult metric to measure reliably, as its value can be influenced by how it’s calculated and by small variations in technique. Some biomechanists argue that impulse-based metrics are more robust.⁷⁰

Real-World Example (Weightlifting): Two powerlifters may have the same maximal squat strength (similar peak force). However, the lifter with a higher RFD can initiate the upward movement from the bottom of the squat more explosively, which can be the difference between successfully completing the lift and failing.

Loading Rate: A Controversial Metric for Injury Risk

In the context of running, one specific application of RFD has gained significant attention: the loading rate. This is the slope of the vertical GRF curve during the initial impact phase of a foot strike, typically in the first 50 milliseconds.⁷¹ It represents the rate at which the impact shock is transmitted up the body.

The theory is that a higher or steeper loading rate gives the musculoskeletal system less time to absorb the impact, potentially increasing the stress on tissues and leading to a higher risk of overuse injuries like stress fractures.⁷³ While this is intuitively appealing, the scientific evidence is mixed. Many large-scale, prospective studies—which track healthy runners over time—have found no significant association between a runner’s baseline loading rate and their subsequent risk of injury.⁷² Furthermore, the calculated value of the loading rate can vary dramatically depending on the specific calculation method used and the speed at which the runner was tested, making it difficult to compare results across different studies or clinics.⁷² Therefore, while loading rate can provide some information about a runner’s impact style, using it as a standalone predictor for injury risk should be approached with considerable caution.

The following table provides a quick-reference guide that distills the most important metrics into a simple, easy-to-understand format for practitioners.

Metric	What It Is (Simple Definition)	What It Tells You (Practical Insight)
Fx, Fy, Fz	The raw forces measured in the side-to-side, forward-backward, and up-down directions.36	The fundamental building blocks of all other calculations. Shows the magnitude of force in each cardinal direction.
Mx, My, Mz	The raw twisting forces (torques) measured around each of the three axes.36	Used to calculate the Center of Pressure. Mz represents the “free torque” or twisting force applied by the foot.
Resultant Force	The single force vector representing the sum of all three force components (Fx​,Fy​,Fz​).42	The true magnitude and direction of the total force being applied. Answers “How hard and in what direction are they pushing?”
Center of Pressure (CoP)	The moving point on the plate’s surface where the resultant force is applied.49	A direct measure of balance and postural control. A larger, faster CoP path indicates more “wobble” and less stability.52
Impulse	The total force applied over a period of time (the area under the force-time curve).60	The “engine” of movement. A larger propulsive impulse leads to a greater change in velocity (e.g., higher jump, faster start).64
Peak Force	The single highest point on the force-time curve.62	A measure of an athlete’s maximal strength capacity for a specific movement.
Rate of Force Development (RFD)	How quickly force is generated (the slope of the force-time curve).62	A key measure of explosiveness and power. Crucial for sports requiring rapid force generation.
Loading Rate	The slope of the force curve during the initial impact of running.71	Represents how quickly impact shock is transmitted to the body. Its link to injury risk is debated.72

The Force Plate in Action – A Spectrum of Applications

The true power of a 3D force plate is revealed not in the abstract discussion of its metrics, but in its concrete application to real-world problems. From restoring function in a patient to honing the razor’s edge of elite performance, the objective data from force plates provides a window into the mechanics of human movement. The most advanced applications recognize that the body is a complex system and use the data to analyze not just the output of a single limb, but the dynamic, sequential transfer of force—between limbs, from the ground up through the kinetic chain, or from a braking phase to a propulsive one.

In the Clinic: A Window into Rehabilitation and Health

In clinical settings, force plates replace subjective guesswork with objective, quantifiable data, allowing therapists to track progress, tailor interventions, and make evidence-based decisions.

ACL Injury Rehabilitation

• The Problem: Following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, athletes often develop persistent strength deficits and compensatory movement patterns. They may subconsciously favor their uninjured leg, leading to asymmetries that significantly increase the risk of re-injuring the reconstructed knee or injuring the other leg.⁷⁶ Deciding when an athlete is truly ready to return to the dynamic, unpredictable environment of their sport is a critical and high-stakes decision. Relying on time post-surgery or the athlete’s subjective feeling of readiness is often insufficient.
• The Force Plate Solution: Dual force plates (one for each foot) have become an indispensable tool in modern ACL rehabilitation.⁷⁷ By having the athlete perform a series of jump-landing tasks, a physical therapist can objectively quantify limb symmetry. Metrics like
  peak landing force asymmetry, eccentric loading rate (how well the knee absorbs force), and power output during takeoff are compared between the injured and uninjured limbs.⁶³ This data allows the therapist to identify specific deficits. For example, an athlete might be able to jump to a similar height with both legs but land with significantly less force on the surgically repaired side, indicating a lack of confidence or control. Based on this objective data, the therapist can set clear, quantitative milestones for progression (e.g., achieving less than 10% asymmetry in landing force) before clearing the athlete for more demanding activities, thereby reducing the risk of a devastating re-injury.⁶³

Neurological Rehabilitation (Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s)

• The Problem: Neurological conditions like stroke, MS, and Parkinson’s disease can severely impair the central nervous system’s ability to control posture and coordinate gait, leading to a high risk of debilitating falls.¹⁹
• The Force Plate Solution: Force plates offer an objective and highly sensitive method for documenting deficits in balance and postural control, often detecting subtle issues that standard clinical balance scales might miss.⁵⁴ The primary metric used is the
  Center of Pressure (CoP). During a quiet standing test, the amount of CoP sway (excursion) and the speed of that sway (velocity) provide a direct measure of postural instability.⁵² Therapists can use this data to quantify a patient’s baseline deficit, track their response to a rehabilitation program, and assess the effectiveness of interventions like task-oriented sit-to-stand exercises.⁷⁹ In advanced applications, machine learning models are even being developed that use CoP data from a patient’s gait to help predict their long-term functional outcome after a stroke.⁵⁶

Balance Assessment in the Elderly

• The Problem: Falls are a leading cause of injury, loss of independence, and mortality in older adults. Identifying individuals at high risk is a major public health priority.
• The Force Plate Solution: Similar to neurological rehab, force plates provide an objective tool to quantify age-related declines in balance. By performing simple tests like standing quietly with eyes open and then eyes closed, or standing in a narrow tandem stance, clinicians can measure CoP excursion.⁵⁷ An increase in sway, especially when visual input is removed (eyes closed), can indicate a decline in the somatosensory or vestibular systems that are critical for balance. This allows for the early detection of fall risk and the creation of personalized balance training programs designed to improve stability and confidence.⁵⁷

On the Field: The Science of Elite Performance

In elite sports, where victory is often decided by inches or milliseconds, 3D force plates provide the granular data needed to optimize technique, monitor fatigue, and maximize power output.

Jump Profiling (e.g., Basketball, Volleyball)

• Application: The vertical jump is a fundamental measure of lower-body power. Force plates, particularly when used to analyze a Countermovement Jump (CMJ), provide far more than just jump height.⁶³ They reveal the athlete’s entire force-production
  strategy.
• Metrics & Insights: The force-time curve is broken down into phases. The eccentric phase (the initial dip) shows how effectively an athlete loads their muscles and utilizes elastic energy. The concentric phase (the upward push) reveals their propulsive force and power capabilities.⁶³ For assessing reactive explosiveness, the
  Drop Jump (DJ) is used to calculate the Reactive Strength Index (RSI)—a ratio of jump height to ground contact time—which measures the efficiency of the fast stretch-shortening cycle (SSC).⁶⁷ Coaches use this data for talent identification, tailoring training programs (e.g., an athlete with low RFD needs more explosive work), and monitoring neuromuscular fatigue, as a drop in jump performance can be an early warning sign of overtraining.²¹

Baseball Pitching Analysis

• Application: To understand the kinetic chain of a pitcher, force plates are embedded directly into a pitching mound—one under the rubber for the drive leg and one or two in the landing area for the lead leg.⁴⁷
• Metrics & Insights: The analysis focuses on the transfer of force. A powerful pitch is initiated by a strong linear drive from the back leg, generating a large anterior-posterior GRF (Fy​) directed toward the plate. This momentum is then transferred up the body and abruptly halted by the front leg, which creates a massive braking force (a “block”). Research shows a strong correlation between both the drive force of the rear leg and the braking force of the front leg with ball velocity.⁴⁶ An inefficient transfer of force from the ground up often forces the throwing arm to “make up the difference,” generating more of the velocity itself, which dramatically increases the torque on the elbow and shoulder and elevates injury risk.⁸⁵

Golf Swing Analysis

• Application: Elite golf coaches use dual force plates to analyze the complex interplay of forces that generate clubhead speed.⁸⁷
• Metrics & Insights: The analysis goes far beyond simple weight shift. Coaches examine the magnitude and, more importantly, the timing of three distinct forces: the vertical force (pushing up from the ground), the horizontal shear force (shifting laterally toward the target), and the rotational force or torque (twisting against the ground). The “kinematic sequence” of an elite golfer often involves a smooth lateral shift of pressure toward the lead foot during the backswing, followed by a powerful rotational force from both feet to turn the hips, and culminating in a massive, late vertical push-off with the lead leg through impact to generate power and control.⁸⁷

Running and Sprinting Gait

• Application: A series of force plates embedded in a runway allows for a detailed analysis of the GRF profile of multiple consecutive foot strikes during running or sprinting.⁶
• Metrics & Insights: For distance runners, analysis of the vertical GRF curve (identifying the initial impact peak and the later active peak), the braking and propulsive components of the anterior-posterior force, and any excessive medial-lateral forces can help identify mechanical inefficiencies that may waste energy or contribute to overuse injuries.⁷¹ For sprinters, the key is maximizing the net propulsive impulse. At the start, the horizontal impulse generated against the starting blocks is what determines the athlete’s acceleration out of the blocks.⁶¹

In the Workplace: Building a Safer Environment

Ergonomics and Lifting Technique

• The Problem: Musculoskeletal disorders, particularly lower back injuries resulting from improper manual handling and lifting techniques, are a massive cause of pain, disability, and economic cost in the workplace.⁹³
• The Force Plate Solution: Force plates are used in ergonomic research to objectively measure the ground reaction forces produced during various lifting tasks.⁹⁵ When this kinetic data is combined with kinematic data from a motion capture system, researchers can use a process called
  inverse dynamics to calculate the internal compressive and shear forces acting on the lumbar spine and other joints. This allows for a direct, quantitative comparison of different lifting strategies (e.g., a “squat lift” vs. a “stoop lift”), identifying which techniques minimize the dangerous loads on the spine and providing an evidence base for creating safer workplace practices and training programs.³⁹

The synergy created by combining force plates with other technologies like motion capture is profound. A force plate alone tells you the what of force (its magnitude, direction, and point of application). Motion capture tells you the how of movement (joint angles and velocities). When used together, they allow for a full biomechanical diagnosis. This combination enables a clinician or researcher to move beyond saying “you are landing with too much force” to a far more specific and actionable diagnosis like “you are landing with too much force, and your knee is collapsing inward, which is creating a dangerously high abduction moment at the joint.” This level of insight is the pinnacle of modern movement analysis and explains why high-end laboratories always integrate these systems.¹¹

The Cost of Clarity – Analyzing the Price Hurdle and Accessibility Gap

While the benefits of 3D force plate analysis are clear, the technology’s adoption has long been constrained by a significant barrier: cost. The price tag has historically been the primary factor limiting these powerful tools to elite research institutions and top-tier professional sports organizations. Although recent innovations have created a more accessible market, a considerable “accessibility gap” remains, preventing many who could benefit most from harnessing this technology. Understanding this economic landscape is crucial for appreciating both the current limitations and the future potential of force plate technology.

The Investment Spectrum

The market for force plates can be broadly categorized into three tiers, each with a vastly different price point and target user.

1. High-End Research Systems: At the top of the pyramid are the laboratory-grade, often permanently installed, 3D force plates from legacy manufacturers like Kistler, AMTI, and Bertec. These systems are the gold standard for scientific research, offering the highest levels of accuracy, precision, and durability. However, this performance comes at a premium. A single 3D plate can cost anywhere from $10,000 to over $20,000 USD, and specialized systems like instrumented pitching mounds or multi-plate gait walkways can represent a capital investment of hundreds of thousands of dollars.⁹⁹ This price point makes them prohibitive for all but the most well-funded research labs and professional sports franchises.
2. The “Pro-sumer” Tier: The most significant market development has been the rise of a middle tier of portable, dual-plate systems designed for applied settings. Companies like Kinvent have pioneered this space, offering systems that balance performance with affordability.¹⁹

The business models in this tier vary:

• Hardware Purchase + Software Subscription: Companies like Kinvent typically sell the hardware outright, with prices for a dual-plate system ranging from approximately $30,000 to $35,000 USD, coupled with an ongoing annual or multi-year software subscription that can cost between $350 and $2,000 per year.¹⁹
• Subscription/Lease Model: VALD Performance – only offering 1D force plates – utilizes a subscription model where the hardware and software are bundled into a single recurring fee, which might be around $3,200 annually over a three-year term.¹⁹
  

3. Low-Cost Alternatives: At the base of the pyramid are tools that provide some related metrics but do not directly measure 3D ground reaction forces. These include jump mats that calculate jump height from flight time, and smartphone apps like “My Jump 2,” which can cost as little as $10 and use the phone’s camera to estimate jump height.²¹ While incredibly accessible, these tools lack the kinetic detail, accuracy, and versatility of a true force plate.

*Approximate costs are based on 2023-2024 data and may vary. Includes basic software and necessary accessories.¹⁹

The Accessibility Gap: Who Is Left Behind?

Despite the progress in the “pro-sumer” market, the cost of a reliable dual force plate system remains a significant hurdle for many sectors that stand to gain the most.

• High School and Youth Sports: With budgets stretched thin, the five-figure investment required for a force plate system is simply out of reach for the vast majority of high school and youth sports programs.¹⁰⁵ This is a critical gap, as this is the age where identifying injury risk factors and optimizing movement mechanics can have the greatest long-term impact.
• Small Private Physical Therapy Clinics: Many independent PTs, especially those in cash-based practices, find the initial outlay and ongoing subscription costs difficult to justify compared to cheaper, traditional assessment tools.²¹ The business model itself—purchase versus subscription—is now a key factor in accessibility. A subscription lowers the upfront barrier but can be more expensive long-term, creating a complex financial decision for a small business owner.¹⁹
• Underserved and Developing Regions: On a global scale, access to this level of sports science and medical technology is almost non-existent in developing nations and underserved communities, creating a stark disparity in healthcare and athletic development opportunities.¹⁰⁸

The Untapped Potential: What Could Widespread Access Achieve?

Imagining a world where 3D force plates are truly affordable and ubiquitous reveals a transformative potential for public health and human performance.

• Revolutionizing Youth Injury Prevention: If every high school or youth sports club could afford a force plate system, they could implement large-scale biomechanical screening. Imagine identifying athletes with the high knee abduction moments associated with future ACL tears and intervening with targeted neuromuscular training before the injury ever occurs. This would shift the paradigm from reactive treatment to proactive prevention on a massive scale, saving countless young athletes from devastating, career-altering injuries.¹¹⁰
• Democratizing Elite Training and Talent ID: The sophisticated biomechanical feedback currently reserved for Olympic and professional athletes could become standard practice in high schools. This would not only help develop all young athletes more effectively but also provide an objective tool for talent identification, leveling the playing field and allowing talent to be recognized based on objective physical capacity, not just opportunity.¹⁰⁵
• Enhancing Community and Public Health: Affordable force plates in every local physical therapy clinic, community center, or gym could provide objective, accessible fall-risk assessments for the elderly. This could fuel widespread, data-driven fall prevention programs that enhance quality of life, maintain independence, and dramatically reduce healthcare costs associated with fall-related injuries.⁵⁷
• Creating Safer Workplaces: Low-cost, portable force plates could be easily deployed in industrial settings to quickly assess the biomechanics of lifting, pushing, and pulling tasks. This would allow companies to objectively validate safer work practices and redesign tasks to minimize the physical strain on employees, reducing the incidence of costly and painful musculoskeletal disorders.⁹⁵

The biggest barrier to achieving this future is no longer just the cost of the hardware. It is a combination of cost, complexity, and the “data deluge.” Even with a more affordable system, practitioners can be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of data produced—a single jump can generate over 100 different metrics.²⁰ This creates a new barrier of “analysis paralysis.” Consequently, the future of accessibility depends not just on cheaper sensors, but on smarter, AI-driven software that can translate the complex physics into simple, actionable insights for the end-user. The value is rapidly shifting from the plate itself to the intelligent platform that interprets its data.

The Next Frontier – The Future of Force Measurement

The evolution of the force plate is far from over. A confluence of advancements in hardware, software, and artificial intelligence is poised to make these tools more powerful, more integrated, and more accessible than ever before. The future of biomechanics is not a single “winner” technology, but an interconnected ecosystem where different tools—from lab-grade force plates to consumer wearables—work together to provide a holistic, longitudinal view of human movement.

Hardware Evolution: Smaller, Cheaper, and Everywhere

The physical form of the force plate will continue to evolve, becoming less constrained and more embedded in our environments.

• Radical Affordability and Novel Sensors: The most significant potential breakthrough is in sensor technology. Researchers are actively developing novel, low-cost 3D force sensors using materials like magnetic soft composites. Prototypes built with these sensors, which cost less than $25 each, have shown excellent agreement with gold-standard lab plates. This could slash the total component cost of a 3D force plate from over $10,000 to just a few hundred dollars, a paradigm shift that would truly democratize the technology.⁹⁹
• Continued Miniaturization and Wireless Integration: The trend toward lightweight, battery-powered, and fully wireless systems will accelerate, making in-field assessment the undisputed norm.²⁵ Digital technology with integrated amplifiers and Ethernet or Bluetooth connectivity simplifies setup, allowing for large, synchronized networks of 16 or more plates to be connected with ease.²⁵
• Innovative Form Factors: We will see force-sensing technology integrated into a wider range of environments. Fully instrumented pitching mounds ⁸³, force-sensing staircases for clinical analysis ³², and even dynamic moving floors that can simulate uneven terrain for golf or balance training are already emerging.¹¹⁹

Software and Ecosystem Integration: A More Complete Picture

The true power of future systems will come from their ability to fuse data from multiple sources, creating a comprehensive biomechanical profile.

• Seamless Fusion with Motion Capture: The future is not a choice between force plates (kinetics) and motion capture (kinematics), but a seamless integration of the two.⁹⁸ This combination allows for inverse dynamics calculations, providing a complete picture of the forces acting on the joints, not just at the ground.
• The Rise of Markerless Motion Capture: AI-powered markerless motion capture is set to revolutionize this integration. By using standard video cameras (even from a smartphone) to estimate 3D body position, it eliminates the need for time-consuming marker placement and expensive infrared camera systems. While its accuracy for some complex movements is still being validated against gold-standard marker-based systems, its ease of use and extreme accessibility make it a powerful and natural partner for force plates, bringing full-body biomechanical analysis out of the lab and into any environment.⁴⁷
• Immersive Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality (VR): The combination of force plates and VR is creating powerful new paradigms for rehabilitation and training. A patient can wear a VR headset and practice their balance on a “virtual boat deck” that sways in perfect synchrony with a dynamic force plate beneath their feet. An athlete can perform agility drills in a simulated game environment, reacting to virtual opponents, while their cutting forces are precisely measured.¹²⁴ This fusion of physical and virtual feedback enhances engagement, motivation, and the transfer of skills to real-world activities.¹²⁶

The AI Biomechanist: The Brains Behind the Brawn

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are the “brains” that will unlock the full potential of this rich data ecosystem.

• Automated Analysis and Insight Generation: AI algorithms will move far beyond calculating simple metrics like peak force. They will be able to analyze entire force-time curves, identifying subtle patterns, movement strategies, and deviations from an individual’s norm that a human eye would easily miss.⁹⁸ This will automate much of the analysis process, saving time and reducing human error.
• Predictive Modeling: By training on massive datasets of athlete and patient data, AI models will become increasingly accurate at predicting outcomes. They will be able to identify athletes at high risk for a specific injury based on their movement “signature” or forecast a stroke patient’s recovery trajectory, allowing for earlier and more targeted interventions.⁵⁶
• Solving Complex Problems: Deep learning is already showing promise in solving classic biomechanics challenges. For example, AI models can learn to accurately predict ground reaction forces from kinematic (motion capture) data alone, potentially reducing the need for force plates in certain scenarios or solving the “indeterminacy problem” of how to distribute forces between the two feet during the double-support phase of walking.¹²⁸

Beyond the Plate: The Rise of Affordable Alternatives

While force plates become more advanced, a parallel trend is the rise of viable, affordable alternatives designed for continuous, real-world monitoring.

• Smart Insoles: This is arguably the most promising emerging technology for democratizing kinetic analysis. Pressure-sensing insoles are worn inside the shoe, allowing them to collect data during natural, over-ground activities like walking on a trail or playing a full game—scenarios impossible to capture with a stationary force plate.¹²⁹ Historically, their accuracy has been a major limitation.¹³¹ However, new smart insoles combined with sophisticated AI algorithms are dramatically closing this gap, with recent studies demonstrating the ability to estimate 3D GRF with error rates as low as 4%, rivaling the performance of some lab equipment.¹²⁹ These devices are poised to be a game-changer for accessible gait analysis and long-term health monitoring.¹³²
• Wearable Accelerometers (IMUs): Inertial Measurement Units—the accelerometers and gyroscopes found in every smartphone and fitness tracker—are already ubiquitous. They are excellent for tracking activity levels, step counts, and basic gait parameters like cadence.¹³³ However, it is important to recognize their limitations. They do not directly measure force, and their accuracy can be affected by issues like sensor drift, inconsistent placement on the body, and difficulties in separating the effects of gravity from true movement acceleration.¹³⁵

As these technologies mature, the future of biomechanical assessment will likely be a multi-tiered ecosystem. Gold-standard force plates will remain essential for high-fidelity research and validation. Portable plates will be the workhorses for in-clinic and on-field testing. And wearables like smart insoles and IMUs will provide continuous, real-world data, with AI acting as the intelligent bridge connecting all tiers. A patient might get a precise “snapshot” assessment on a force plate in a clinic, which is then used to calibrate a smart insole they wear for the next month, with an AI algorithm monitoring their daily movement patterns for any deviations from their healthy baseline. This creates a powerful, longitudinal view of movement health that was previously unimaginable.

As this technological shift occurs, the role of the human expert—the coach, the therapist, the doctor—will also evolve. As data collection and analysis become increasingly automated, their value will shift away from being a data technician to being a master interpreter, communicator, and problem-solver. The most valuable skills will be the uniquely human ones: understanding the patient or athlete as a whole person, contextualizing the objective data with their goals and life circumstances, communicating the findings in an empathetic and motivating way, and designing creative, effective interventions. The future is not about being replaced by technology, but about being empowered by it to practice at a higher level.

The Democratization of Biomechanics

The journey of the 3D force plate—from a cumbersome, lab-bound machine accessible only to a privileged few, to a portable, connected, and increasingly intelligent tool for the many—is more than a story of technological progress. It represents the democratization of a fundamental aspect of human science: the understanding of our own movement.

For too long, the analysis of performance, the guidance of rehabilitation, and the assessment of safety have relied on subjective guesswork and the “coach’s eye.” The force plate’s greatest contribution has been to replace this subjectivity with the clarity of objective, quantitative data.¹³⁹ It provides a common language, grounded in the laws of physics, that allows clinicians, coaches, researchers, and the individuals they serve to see and understand the invisible forces that shape every action.

This democratization is paving the way for a new era in public health and human performance. It is a future where youth sports programs can implement affordable, evidence-based screening to prevent injuries before they happen. A future where physical therapy is no longer a one-size-fits-all protocol but a hyper-personalized intervention guided by precise, objective data. A future where fall prevention for the elderly becomes a data-driven community health initiative, and where every worker can be taught how to move in a way that protects their body. It is a future where every individual, from the elite athlete to the patient in recovery, has access to insights that can help them move better, perform better, and live healthier, more capable lives.¹¹⁵

Understanding the forces that govern our physical existence is no longer a niche scientific pursuit. It is becoming a fundamental and accessible component of optimizing human health and unlocking our full potential. The ground, once a silent partner in our movements, is finally beginning to speak—and with the help of the 3D force plate, we are all learning to listen.

Works cited

1. So what exactly is a force plate? – HAWKIN DYNAMICS, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.hawkindynamics.com/blog/what-is-a-force-plate
2. Force Plates: 1-axis vs 3-axis – Noraxon, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.noraxon.com/force-plates-1-axis-vs-3-axis/
3. Unlocking Movement Secrets with Force Plates, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-force-plates-biomechanics
4. Understanding Force Plates in Biomechanics and Their Impact on Athletic Performance, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://blog.s3dinc.com/understanding-force-plates-in-biomechanics-and-their-impact-on-athletic-performance
5. Force Plates and Their Applications – BMEC.asia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://bmec.asia/my/force-plates-and-their-applications
6. Force plate: function and applications | Kistler, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/INT/en/force-plate/C00000113
7. Force Plates 101: What are they and why are they used? – VALD Health, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://valdhealth.com/news/force-plates-101-what-are-they-and-why-are-they-used
8. www.kistler.com, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/US/en/3d-force-plate/C00000090#:~:text=A%203D%20force%20plate%20is,measuring%20highly%20dynamic%20movement%20sequences.
9. Force platform – Wikipedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_platform
10. Force Plates Overview: What They Are & Their Applications – BMEC.asia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://bmec.asia/force-plates-overview-and-applications
11. 3D force plate: function and applications | Kistler, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/INT/en/3d-force-plate/C00000090
12. www.kistler.com, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/US/en/force-plate/C00000113#:~:text=A%20three%2Dcomponent%20force%20plate,of%20the%20center%20of%20mass.
13. Introducing KINVENT K-Deltas 3D Force Plates – JLW Instruments, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://jlwforce.com/blogs/strength-assessment-and-physiotherapy-blog/introducing-kinvent-k-deltas-3d-force-plates
14. Historical development and key contributors | Sports Biomechanics Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/sports-biomechanics/unit-1/historical-development-key-contributors/study-guide/VnqmjN7pnIl72o06
15. A historical review of gait analysis – Neurosciences Journal, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://nsj.org.sa/content/nsj/13/2/105.full.pdf
16. Design, Analysis, and Fabrication of a Piezoelectric Force Tray for Total Knee Replacements, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6904108/
17. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_platform#:~:text=1976%E2%80%A2%20Advanced%20Mechanical%20Technology,of%20the%20Boston%20Children’s%20Hospital.&text=2017%E2%80%A2%20Hawkin%20Dynamics%20created,force%20platform%20and%20mobile%20app.
18. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_platform#:~:text=History,-Chronology&text=1976%E2%80%A2%20Advanced%20Mechanical%20Technology,of%20the%20Boston%20Children’s%20Hospital.
19. Digital Force Plate Comparison: KINVENT, VALD & Hawkin – JLW Instruments, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://jlwforce.com/blogs/strength-assessment-and-physiotherapy-blog/how-to-choose-the-right-force-plates-for-your-practice
20. A Practical Guide for Using Force Plates in Elite Sports – SimpliFaster, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://simplifaster.com/articles/force-plates-practical-guide/
21. A Physical Therapist’s Guide for Buying Force Plates – SimpliFaster, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://simplifaster.com/articles/physical-therapist-force-plate-buyers-guide/
22. Piezoelectric sensor – Wikipedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectric_sensor
23. Piezo vs. strain gauge | Kistler, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/INT/en/piezo-vs.-strain-gauge/C00000145
24. Load Cells Versus Piezoelectric Sensors – Interface Force Measurement Solutions, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.interfaceforce.com/load-cells-versus-piezoelectric-sensors/
25. Kistler introduces portable digital 3D force plate for biomechanical measurements, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/PT/pt/kistler-introduces-portable-digital-3d-force-plate-for-biomechanical-measurements/C00000789
26. Piezoelectric force sensor | Kistler, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/US/en/piezoelectric-force-sensor/C00000137
27. Piezoelectric or Strain Gauge Based Force Transducers? – HBKWorld.com, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.hbkworld.com/en/knowledge/resource-center/articles/piezoelectric-or-strain-gauge-based-force-transducers
28. Force: Piezo vs. Strain Gauge – YouTube, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPalJ_0dFck
29. a Kistler force plate supports a gait lab at ONCE University School of Physiotherapy, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.kistler.com/INT/en/gait-analysis-a-kistler-force-plate-supports-a-gait-lab-at-once-university-school-of-physiotherapy/C00000832
30. Strain Gauges, How does it work? – Dwyer Instruments, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.dwyeromega.com/en-us/resources/strain-gages
31. Strain gauge – Wikipedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_gauge
32. Force Plates – Bertec, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.bertec.com/products/force-plates
33. Pressure Mapping & Force Plates: The Building Blocks of Biomechanical Analysis – Tekscan, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.tekscan.com/blog/medical/pressure-mapping-force-plates-building-blocks-biomechanical-analysis
34. Calculating SCALE values for force plates – C3D.ORG, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.c3d.org/HTML/Documents/calculatingscalevaluesforforceplates.htm
35. Cross-Talk Compensation Using Matrix Methods – HITEC Sensors – Humanetics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://hitec.humaneticsgroup.com/perspectives/cross-talk-compensation-using-matrix-methods
36. Force Platforms [HAS-Motion Software Documentation], accessed on June 23, 2025, https://wiki.has-motion.com/doku.php?id=visual3d:tutorials:kinematics_and_kinetics:force_platforms
37. BME 315 Biomechanics Kinematic analysis of center of mass and center of pressure determination, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://lakeslab.ep.wisc.edu/BME315L2a.pdf
38. A guide to using force plates in sports performance – Sportsmith, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.sportsmith.co/articles/guide-to-using-force-plates-in-sports-performance/
39. Force Plate Recalibration is Critical for Accurate Data and Performance – AMTI, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.amti.biz/2024/10/16/force-plate-recalibration-is-critical-for-accurate-data-and-performance/
40. Preparing Force Data, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://opensimconfluence.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OpenSim/pages/53090636/Preparing+Force+Data
41. Forceplate centre or presure and Free moment – Biomch-L, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://biomch-l.isbweb.org/forum/biomch-l-forums/general-discussion/33047-forceplate-centre-or-presure-and-free-moment
42. What is the Resultant Force and How to Find it (with Examples) – Phyley, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.phyley.com/find-resultant-force
43. Problem 2-37 Determine the magnitude of the resultant force acting on gusset plate and its direction – YouTube, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEf6bOF6EmI
44. Measuring Force and Direction Using Vector Addition – Dummies.com, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/science/physics/measuring-force-and-direction-using-vector-addition-174224/
45. Vector Forces – ropebook, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.ropebook.com/information/vector-forces/
46. Analyzing Lower Half Pitching Mechanics Using Force Plates – Driveline Baseball, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.drivelinebaseball.com/2017/02/analyzing-lower-half-pitching-mechanics-using-force-plates/
47. A breakdown of what biomechanics really is and how we use it within our evaluations – University of Nebraska Omaha, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.unomaha.edu/college-of-education-health-and-human-sciences/sports-medicine-and-biomechanics/community/blog-post-2.php
48. gait analysis theory, accessed on June 23, 2025, http://courses.washington.edu/bioen520/slides/Gait_Analysis_Theory.pdf
49. Center of pressure (terrestrial locomotion) – Wikipedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_pressure_(terrestrial_locomotion)
50. The Science Behind Force Plate Data – Bertec, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.bertec.com/blog/the-science-behind-force-plate-datanbsp
51. Review of the Upright Balance Assessment Based on the Force Plate – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7967421/
52. Center of pressure excursion as a measure of balance performance in patients with non-specific low back pain compared to healthy controls: a systematic review of the literature – PubMed Central, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3048236/
53. Center-of-Pressure Parameters Used in the Assessment of Postural Control – Search StFX.ca, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://people.stfx.ca/smackenz/courses/HK474/Data%20Sets%20Used%20in%20Class/Project%202/Palmieri%202002%20Center-of-Pressure%20Parameters%20Used%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20postural%20control.pdf
54. The Clinical Relevance of Force Platform Measures in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3671534/
55. Approximate Entropy and Velocity of Center of Pressure to Determine Postural Stability: A Pilot Study – MDPI, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/16/9259
56. Center of Pressure- and Machine Learning-based Gait Score and Clinical Risk Factors for Predicting Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke – PubMed, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39187003/
57. Using Force Plates To Measure Balance And Stability In Older Populations – NK Active, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://nkactive.co.uk/using-force-plates-to-measure-balance-and-stability-in-older-populations/
58. Center of Pressure Trajectory during Gait: A Comparison of Four Foot Positions – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4029865/
59. A Novel Method for Gait Analysis on Center of Pressure Excursion Based on a Pressure-Sensitive Mat – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7663129/
60. What is impulse and how is it calculated ? – Kinvent, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://quickstart.k-invent.com/what-is-impulse-and-how-is-it-calculated/
61. Q4E Case Study 01 – Impulse – Quintic Sports, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.quinticsports.com/case-study/q4e-case-study-01-impulse-2/
62. Force Plates for Sports Performance — Bertec, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.bertec.com/blog/force-plates-and-their-role-in-sports-performance
63. Understanding the Countermovement Jump – VALD Performance, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://valdperformance.com/news/understanding-the-countermovement-jump
64. The Battle of the Equations: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11561012/
65. Solved During a sprint start, the force between the feet and | Chegg.com, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/sprint-start-force-feet-starting-block-measured-force-sensor-diagram-shows-total-horizonta-q101091346
66. analysis of the sprint start, swimming start and volleyball push off in generating impulse-momentum, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/5677/5168
67. ForceDecks: A Dual Force Plate System by VALD – Science for Sport, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.scienceforsport.com/forcedecks-dual-force-plate-system-by-vald/
68. Force Plates: What are they and what insights do they provide coaches? – Science for Sport, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.scienceforsport.com/force-plates-what-are-they-and-what-insights-do-they-provide-coaches/
69. A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO 3-AXIS FORCE PLATES – Sports Hungary, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://sportshungary.hu/letoltesek/Ebook_3D_DELTAS__.pdf
70. How to use force plates effectively: An expert roundtable – YouTube, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RILna3flQ4I
71. Ground Reaction Force Differences Between Running Shoes, Racing Flats, and Distance Spikes in Runners. – Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.jssm.org/jssm-09-147.xml%3EFulltext
72. Vertical Loading Rate Is not Associated with Running Injury, Regardless of Calculation Method – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288487/
73. Ground Reaction Forces and Loading Rates Associated with Parkour and Traditional Drop Landing Techniques – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3761764/
74. Vertical Loading Rate Should Not Be Used as a Predictor of Running Injury – ACSM, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://acsm.org/vertical-loading-running-injury-predictor/
75. Vertical Loading Rate is Not Associated With Running Injury, Regardless of Calcu – Scribd, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/839173359/Vertical-Loading-Rate-is-Not-Associated-With-Running-Injury-Regardless-of-Calcu
76. Prediction of ACL Injuries from Vertical Jump Kinetics in Division 1 Collegiate Athletes, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872458/
77. Force Plates — Good Reps Physical Therapy | Brooklyn, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.goodrepspt.com/force-plates
78. ACL Return to Sport Testing Using Force Plates – Union Physical Therapy, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://unionpt.com/return-to-sport-testing-using-force-plates/
79. Center of Pressure and Ground Reaction Force Analysis of Task-oriented Sit-to-stand in Stroke Patients – Korea Journal Central, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://journal.kci.go.kr/kspm/archive/articleView?artiId=ART002902016
80. How To Perform Balance Assessment With Force Plates In Health And Fitness, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.strengthbynumbers.com/how-to-perform-balance-assessment-with-force-plates-in-health-and-fitness/
81. Balance Assessment – Physiopedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Balance_Assessment
82. Jump Testing with Force Plates Explained – Global Performance Insights, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.globalperformanceinsights.com/post/jump-testing-with-force-plates-explained
83. Instrumented Pitching Mound | 3D Force Measurement – AMTI, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.amti.biz/product/instrumented-pitching-mound/
84. Biomechanical Analysis of the Throwing Athlete and Its Impact on Return to Sport – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8811517/
85. Connecting the Dots Between Throwing Mechanics and Throwing Related Injuries with Force Plates – Chapman Baseball Compound, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://chapmanbaseball.com/weekly-research-discussion-with-drew/
86. (PDF) Combined Countermovement Jump Testing and Motion Analysis as the Future of Performance Assessment for Baseball Pitchers: A Narrative Review – ResearchGate, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368362473_Combined_Countermovement_Jump_Testing_and_Motion_Analysis_as_the_Future_of_Performance_Assessment_for_Baseball_Pitchers_A_Narrative_Review
87. Force vs Pressure – Swing Catalyst, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://swingcatalyst.com/resources/articles/force-vs-pressure
88. 3D Force Plates – Junior Players Golf Academy – West Sussex, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://juniorplayersacademy.uk/golf-academy/programme-resources/3d-force-plates/
89. Portable Force Plates – Swing Catalyst, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://swingcatalyst.com/products/portable-force-plates
90. 3D Dual Force Plates | High-Precision 3D Motion Analysis – Smart2Move, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.smart2move.com/devices/3d-dual-force-plates
91. Running Gait Analysis San Ramon | Ironhorse Physical Therapy & Pilates, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.ironhorsept.com/running-gait-analysis-near-me-san-ramon/
92. Biomechanics of Running and Walking – American Statistical Association, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://ww2.amstat.org/mam/2010/essays/TongenWunderlichRunWalk.pdf
93. Ergonomic Assessment of Key Biomechanical Factors in Patient Lifting: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study – MDPI, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/17/8076
94. Biomechanical analysis of lifting | PPT – SlideShare, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/biomechanical-analysis-of-lifting/48199791
95. Ergonomics in Movement Analysis – Number Analytics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-ergonomics-movement-analysis
96. About AMTI | Force Sensor Manufacturer, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.amti.biz/about-amti/
97. Biomechanics of Ergonomics Assessment – Number Analytics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/biomechanics-ergonomics-assessment
98. Force Plate Technology Innovation — Bertec, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.bertec.com/blog/the-future-of-force-plate-technology
99. Novel 3D Force Sensors for a Cost-Effective 3D Force Plate for Biomechanical Analysis, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/9/4437
100. Uniaxial vs. Triaxial Force Plates: How many axes do I need? – VALD Performance, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://valdperformance.com/en/news/uniaxial-vs-triaxial-force-plates
101. Novel 3D Force Sensors for a Cost-Effective 3D Force Plate for Biomechanical Analysis, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10181757/
102. KINVENT K-Deltas 3D Force Plates – JLW Instruments, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://jlwforce.com/products/k-deltas-3d
103. KINVENT K-FORCE & K-Delta Digital Force Plates – JLW Instruments, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://jlwforce.com/collections/plates
104. My Jump 2 App vs. Force Plates: Balancing Benefits, Limitations, and Clinical Solutions, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.purahealth.net/post/my-jump-2-app-vs-force-plates-balancing-benefits-limitations-and-clinical-solutions
105. Understanding Force Plate Testing in Basketball – Adam Ringler, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://adamringler.com/understanding-force-plate-testing-in-basketball/
106. E792 | The New Economics of Cash-Based Practices in 2025 – PT Biz, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.physicaltherapybiz.com/blog/the-new-economics-of-cash-based-practices-in-2025
107. Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11395122/
108. Exploring the transformative role of 3D printing in advancing medical education in Africa: a review, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10552964/
109. News: The Old North State League partners with WinShares to democratize Sports in NC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.oldnorthstateleague.com/news/the-old-north-state-league-partners-with-winshares
110. Advancement in Sports Injury Prevention: The Role of Biomechanics and Technology, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.sportsmed.org/membership/sports-medicine-update/summer-2024/advancement-in-sports-injury-prevention-the-role-of-biomechanics-and-technology
111. 8 Tips To Prevent Sports Injuries in Young Athletes – Scripps Health, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.scripps.org/news_items/2973-8-tips-to-prevent-sports-injuries-in-young-athletes
112. Injury Prevention in Sport – Physiopedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Injury_Prevention_in_Sport
113. Empowering athletes: The application of biomechanics in physical education teaching, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://ojs.sin-chn.com/index.php/mcb/article/view/306
114. Empowering athletes: The application of biomechanics in physical education teaching, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389163216_Empowering_athletes_The_application_of_biomechanics_in_physical_education_teaching
115. Breaking Down Barriers in Biomechanics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/breaking-down-barriers-biomechanics
116. Biomechanics Laboratory – College of Health | Oregon State University, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://health.oregonstate.edu/kinesiology/labs/biomechanics-laboratory
117. Force plate methodologies applied to injury profiling and rehabilitation in sport: A scoping review protocol, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10561863/
118. Smart2Move 3D Dual Force Plates – Golf Swing Systems, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.golfswingsystems.co.uk/product/smart2move-3d-dual-force-plates/
119. SMART2MOVE UNVEILS THE GAME-CHANGING SMARTSTAGE: MOVING FLOOR TECHNOLOGY REDEFINES THE FUTURE OF GROUND REACTION FORCE ANALYSIS – The Golf Wire, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://thegolfwire.com/smart2move-smartstage/
120. www.bertec.com, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.bertec.com/blog/the-future-of-force-plate-technology#:~:text=The%20future%20of%20this%20technology,for%20your%20athletes%20and%20patients.
121. Advancing Field-Based Vertical Jump Analysis: Markerless Pose Estimation vs. Force Plates, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/14/12/1641
122. Validity of 3-D Markerless Motion Capture System for Assessing Basketball Dunk Kinetics – A Case Study – The Sport Journal, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://thesportjournal.org/article/validity-of-3-d-markerless-motion-capture-system-for-assessing-basketball-dunk-kinetics/
123. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10494994/
124. Virtual reality rehabilitation systems | Interacoustics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.interacoustics.com/balance-testing-equipment/balance-rehabilitation-systems
125. Virtualis StaticVR – e3 Diagnostics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://e3diagnostics.com/products/virtualis-staticvr
126. Virtual reality-enhanced rehabilitation for improving musculoskeletal function and recovery after trauma – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12016257/
127. The Future of Biomechanics is AI-Driven – Number Analytics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ai-driven-biomechanics-future
128. AI-Assisted Motion Analysis | School of Education and Human Development, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://kin.edu.miami.edu/research-featured-projects/ai-assisted-motion-analysis/index.html
129. Smart Insoles Revolutionize: A Breakthrough in 3D Ground Reaction Force Estimation, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.keaipublishing.com/en/journals/intelligent-sports-and-health/news/smart-insoles-revolutionize-a-breakthrough-in-3d-ground-reaction-force-estimation/
130. Join reaction forces in gait analysis – AnyScript forum, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://forum.anyscript.org/t/join-reaction-forces-in-gait-analysis/8273
131. A wireless, self-powered smart insole for gait monitoring and recognition via nonlinear synergistic pressure sensing – PMC, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12002114/
132. A wearable smart insole can track how you walk, run and stand – Ohio State News, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://news.osu.edu/a-wearable-smart-insole-can-track-how-you-walk-run-and-stand/
133. Context Matters: Real-World Running Gait Analysis with Wearables – Thryve, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.thryve.health/blog/gait-analysis-context
134. Biomechanics Meets Wearables – Number Analytics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/biomechanics-meets-wearables
135. The Agreement between Wearable Sensors and Force Plates for the Analysis of Stride Time Variability – MDPI, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/11/3378
136. Wearable Devices in Biomechanics – Number Analytics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-wearable-devices-biomechanics
137. Challenges and advances in the use of wearable sensors for lower extremity biomechanics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10529245/
138. Accelerometers in Rehabilitation – Physiopedia, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.physio-pedia.com/Accelerometers_in_Rehabilitation
139. Enhancing Patient Rehabilitation and Performance with Force Plates at Sports Chiropractic Clinics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://m3chiro.com/enhancing-patient-rehabilitation-and-performance-with-force-plates-at-sports-chiropractic-clinics/
140. A Mini-Review on the Utilization of Force Plates in Athlete Rehabilitation – ResearchGate, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382567753_A_Mini-Review_on_the_Utilization_of_Force_Plates_in_Athlete_Rehabilitation
141. Force Plate Testing: Human Performance Assessment – Bertec, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.bertec.com/blog/force-plate-testing-human-performance-assessment
142. Force Plates – On Point Physical Therapy, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.onpointphysio.com/2024/08/10/force-plates/
143. Sports technology is finally being democratized, it’s now time to adapt – BlazePod, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.blazepod.com/blogs/all/sports-technology
144. Designing Human Performance: Behind the Science That Drives Innovation – InventUM, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://news.med.miami.edu/designing-human-performance/
145. Unlocking Accessibility in Biomechanics – Number Analytics, accessed on June 23, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-accessibility-biomechanics